<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 360 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791158</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order was filed more than 21/2 years after the impugned order, and the High Court declined to entertain it on delay and laches. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that refusal and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The operative point is that substantial delay in approaching writ jurisdiction can justify rejection of a challenge to an assessment order when no sufficient basis for interference is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 360 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791158</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order was filed more than 21/2 years after the impugned order, and the High Court declined to entertain it on delay and laches. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that refusal and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The operative point is that substantial delay in approaching writ jurisdiction can justify rejection of a challenge to an assessment order when no sufficient basis for interference is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>