https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468416 A successive anticipatory bail application was found not maintainable where no change in circumstances was shown after earlier refusals had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. The alleged impersonation did not alter the prosecution case that the supposed transferor was fictitious, and a later payment by a co-accused was held irrelevant because criminal courts are not forums for recovery of money and such payment does not erase criminal liability. Suppression of the prior bail history before the Magistrate and Sessions Court further weighed against relief, so anticipatory bail was rejected. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 May 2026 18:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468416 A successive anticipatory bail application was found not maintainable where no change in circumstances was shown after earlier refusals had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. The alleged impersonation did not alter the prosecution case that the supposed transferor was fictitious, and a later payment by a co-accused was held irrelevant because criminal courts are not forums for recovery of money and such payment does not erase criminal liability. Suppression of the prior bail history before the Magistrate and Sessions Court further weighed against relief, so anticipatory bail was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468416