https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468417 A partnership at will dissolved by operation of law on the death of a partner, and in the absence of any contract to the contrary, limitation for a suit for rendition of accounts ran from that dissolution. A suit filed long after dissolution was therefore time-barred, and the court was required to notice the bar even without a plea because admitted facts disclosed a pure question of law. In the connected matter, the decree for dissolution and rendition of accounts was supported by concurrent findings of fact, and no exceptional ground justified appellate interference. The time-barred claim failed, while the concurrent decree remained undisturbed. en-us Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 May 2026 18:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468417 A partnership at will dissolved by operation of law on the death of a partner, and in the absence of any contract to the contrary, limitation for a suit for rendition of accounts ran from that dissolution. A suit filed long after dissolution was therefore time-barred, and the court was required to notice the bar even without a plea because admitted facts disclosed a pure question of law. In the connected matter, the decree for dissolution and rendition of accounts was supported by concurrent findings of fact, and no exceptional ground justified appellate interference. The time-barred claim failed, while the concurrent decree remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468417