<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1926 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468420</link>
    <description>Charges collected by the forest department for permits, park entry and related facilitation were examined for service tax under tour operator and accommodation heads, but the collections were treated as statutory fees linked to conservation and regulation of entry into forest areas. Because the amounts were credited to the State treasury and arose from mandatory statutory functions, they were held not to be consideration for a taxable service. The tribunal followed an earlier identical ruling and held that the service tax demands, along with interest and penalty confirmations, could not survive on the same reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1926 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468420</link>
      <description>Charges collected by the forest department for permits, park entry and related facilitation were examined for service tax under tour operator and accommodation heads, but the collections were treated as statutory fees linked to conservation and regulation of entry into forest areas. Because the amounts were credited to the State treasury and arose from mandatory statutory functions, they were held not to be consideration for a taxable service. The tribunal followed an earlier identical ruling and held that the service tax demands, along with interest and penalty confirmations, could not survive on the same reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>