<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1793 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468424</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on bank deposits made out of operational funds was treated as business income and held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate bench view and applied the principle of consistency, distinguishing the Supreme Court decision relied on by the Revenue because the deposits arose from business-related funds of the society and not from unrelated surplus activity. The disallowance was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1793 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468424</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on bank deposits made out of operational funds was treated as business income and held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate bench view and applied the principle of consistency, distinguishing the Supreme Court decision relied on by the Revenue because the deposits arose from business-related funds of the society and not from unrelated surplus activity. The disallowance was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>