<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 286 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51525</link>
    <description>Recovery of the amount computed at 8% of the value of exempted clearances under Rule 57CC was held unenforceable because neither the Act nor the rules provided a machinery provision for such recovery. The Tribunal noted the assessee&#039;s offer to reverse the credit relatable to inputs used in exempted final products, but the confirmed demand and consequential penalty were based on Rule 57CC recovery and could not stand without statutory authority. The demand and penalty were therefore set aside, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 286 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51525</link>
      <description>Recovery of the amount computed at 8% of the value of exempted clearances under Rule 57CC was held unenforceable because neither the Act nor the rules provided a machinery provision for such recovery. The Tribunal noted the assessee&#039;s offer to reverse the credit relatable to inputs used in exempted final products, but the confirmed demand and consequential penalty were based on Rule 57CC recovery and could not stand without statutory authority. The demand and penalty were therefore set aside, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>