<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468433</link>
    <description>An ex parte GST order and the resulting recovery proceedings were set aside because the petitioner had not filed a reply to the show-cause notice and sought a fresh opportunity to contest the matter. Concerns were raised that the same officer had issued audit observations and then proceeded with the notice and order, and the matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration. Fresh adjudication was directed before a proper officer other than the one who passed the earlier order, with liberty to the petitioner to file replies and raise all contentions. The remand was treated as appropriate to secure a fair hearing and fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1987 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468433</link>
      <description>An ex parte GST order and the resulting recovery proceedings were set aside because the petitioner had not filed a reply to the show-cause notice and sought a fresh opportunity to contest the matter. Concerns were raised that the same officer had issued audit observations and then proceeded with the notice and order, and the matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration. Fresh adjudication was directed before a proper officer other than the one who passed the earlier order, with liberty to the petitioner to file replies and raise all contentions. The remand was treated as appropriate to secure a fair hearing and fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>