https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468409 An approved stage carriage scheme was held to survive despite inclusion of routes not originally published, because the invalid routes were severable from the valid routes. The absence of a specific implementation date did not vitiate approval, as fixation of the operative date belonged to the implementing authority. Applications by the State transport undertaking were treated as timely despite presentation on a public holiday and omission of fee, since six clear weeks were required, the papers were received, and the defect could be returned for correction under the applicable rule. Notice before implementation was found sufficient where operators were informed, heard, and the effective date for existing permits was fixed after that process. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 May 2026 14:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468409 An approved stage carriage scheme was held to survive despite inclusion of routes not originally published, because the invalid routes were severable from the valid routes. The absence of a specific implementation date did not vitiate approval, as fixation of the operative date belonged to the implementing authority. Applications by the State transport undertaking were treated as timely despite presentation on a public holiday and omission of fee, since six clear weeks were required, the papers were received, and the defect could be returned for correction under the applicable rule. Notice before implementation was found sufficient where operators were informed, heard, and the effective date for existing permits was fixed after that process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468409