<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51510</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the demand of Rs. 1,32,378.86 paise against the appellant for wrong availment of Modvat credit without actual receipt of goods. However, the penalty imposed was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 40,000 considering the appellant&#039;s prompt reversal of the credit and corrective actions taken. The tribunal found violations of natural justice unsubstantiated and rejected the time-barred claim due to non-reflective records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51510</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the demand of Rs. 1,32,378.86 paise against the appellant for wrong availment of Modvat credit without actual receipt of goods. However, the penalty imposed was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 40,000 considering the appellant&#039;s prompt reversal of the credit and corrective actions taken. The tribunal found violations of natural justice unsubstantiated and rejected the time-barred claim due to non-reflective records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>