<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retrospective royalty amendments cannot justify TDS on IPLC payments where the non-resident had no permanent establishment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99476</link>
    <description>Payments for hiring International Private Leased Circuits were not liable to tax deduction at source under section 195 because the remittance was not taxable in India absent a permanent establishment. The Court followed its earlier Division Bench ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd., holding that Explanations 4, 5 and 6 inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 could not be applied retrospectively to treat such payments as royalty. The withholding issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retrospective royalty amendments cannot justify TDS on IPLC payments where the non-resident had no permanent establishment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99476</link>
      <description>Payments for hiring International Private Leased Circuits were not liable to tax deduction at source under section 195 because the remittance was not taxable in India absent a permanent establishment. The Court followed its earlier Division Bench ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd., holding that Explanations 4, 5 and 6 inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 could not be applied retrospectively to treat such payments as royalty. The withholding issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>