<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2119 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468392</link>
    <description>Allegations that an accused suppressed the company&#039;s liquidation status and made false representations in a business transaction raised factual disputes as to whether the ingredients of cheating were made out. Because the continuation of dealings after liquidation and the effect of the unpaid liability depended on evidence, the issue could not be finally resolved at the quashing stage. The existence of pending Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings also indicated that the controversy required fuller adjudication. The criminal proceedings were therefore not interfered with at the threshold and were allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 19:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2119 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468392</link>
      <description>Allegations that an accused suppressed the company&#039;s liquidation status and made false representations in a business transaction raised factual disputes as to whether the ingredients of cheating were made out. Because the continuation of dealings after liquidation and the effect of the unpaid liability depended on evidence, the issue could not be finally resolved at the quashing stage. The existence of pending Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings also indicated that the controversy required fuller adjudication. The criminal proceedings were therefore not interfered with at the threshold and were allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>