<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1652 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468394</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustments cannot survive where the underlying TPO order is time-barred. Bank charges and head-office or overseas-branch expenses were treated as deductible branch business expenditure, while related reimbursements were not taxable as benefits or perquisites. Country-risk provisioning remained non-deductible as contingent, but higher depreciation on business-use motor vehicles was allowable. Treaty provisions governed taxability of head-office and overseas-branch allocations, interest and refund interest, substantially deleting FTS and interest additions and restricting commission attribution to prevent double taxation. Back-to-back guarantees required fresh benchmarking, whereas derivative marketing adjustments lacked support and were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1652 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468394</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustments cannot survive where the underlying TPO order is time-barred. Bank charges and head-office or overseas-branch expenses were treated as deductible branch business expenditure, while related reimbursements were not taxable as benefits or perquisites. Country-risk provisioning remained non-deductible as contingent, but higher depreciation on business-use motor vehicles was allowable. Treaty provisions governed taxability of head-office and overseas-branch allocations, interest and refund interest, substantially deleting FTS and interest additions and restricting commission attribution to prevent double taxation. Back-to-back guarantees required fresh benchmarking, whereas derivative marketing adjustments lacked support and were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>