https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468386 Commercial contracts are not void for uncertainty if the parties' intention can be made certain from the documents and surrounding correspondence; apparent differences on security, liquidated damages, advance payment and Clause 32 were harmonised, so the contracts were treated as concluded. A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract extended to the Clause 32 escalation dispute, so the matter was referable to arbitration and the arbitrators had jurisdiction to proceed. An order under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was not appealable, but revisional interference was justified where the court applied the wrong test under Section 29 of the Contract Act, 1872 and committed jurisdictional error. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2026 14:16:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468386 Commercial contracts are not void for uncertainty if the parties' intention can be made certain from the documents and surrounding correspondence; apparent differences on security, liquidated damages, advance payment and Clause 32 were harmonised, so the contracts were treated as concluded. A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract extended to the Clause 32 escalation dispute, so the matter was referable to arbitration and the arbitrators had jurisdiction to proceed. An order under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 was not appealable, but revisional interference was justified where the court applied the wrong test under Section 29 of the Contract Act, 1872 and committed jurisdictional error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468386