<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gauhati High Court on a humane approach and powers of the Commissioner under Section 264.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16331</link>
    <description>Section 264 revision requires the Commissioner to exercise revisional powers through an enquiry-based and humane approach, particularly where the assessee claims exemption and has placed prima facie supporting material on record. The revisional authority is not a passive forum of document collection; it must call for records, conduct or cause further enquiry where necessary, and then pass an order that is not prejudicial to the assessee. Faceless handling of the revision, without meaningful verification or clarification, was treated as falling short of the statutory standard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:57:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gauhati High Court on a humane approach and powers of the Commissioner under Section 264.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16331</link>
      <description>Section 264 revision requires the Commissioner to exercise revisional powers through an enquiry-based and humane approach, particularly where the assessee claims exemption and has placed prima facie supporting material on record. The revisional authority is not a passive forum of document collection; it must call for records, conduct or cause further enquiry where necessary, and then pass an order that is not prejudicial to the assessee. Faceless handling of the revision, without meaningful verification or clarification, was treated as falling short of the statutory standard.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:57:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>