<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 172 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790970</link>
    <description>Section 194-IA threshold is applied with reference to each transferee&#039;s individual share in the property, not the aggregate consideration stated in a single sale deed. Where the assessee&#039;s share fell below the statutory limit, no TDS deduction obligation arose on that amount. On that construction, the intimation under section 200A treating the assessee as an assessee in default for non-deduction of tax could not be sustained, and the consequential demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 172 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790970</link>
      <description>Section 194-IA threshold is applied with reference to each transferee&#039;s individual share in the property, not the aggregate consideration stated in a single sale deed. Where the assessee&#039;s share fell below the statutory limit, no TDS deduction obligation arose on that amount. On that construction, the intimation under section 200A treating the assessee as an assessee in default for non-deduction of tax could not be sustained, and the consequential demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>