<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 177 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790975</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment requires a proper functional comparability analysis before arm&#039;s length price can be affirmed. The record showed a disputed basic profile of the assessee, with one view treating it as a trader in iron ore and coal and another as engaged in production of ferrous products, while the selected comparables were said to have a manufacturing profile. Because the earlier finding on comparability was cryptic and lacked adequate functional and statistical examination, the matter was set aside for fresh consideration by the Dispute Resolution Panel on the assessee&#039;s product profile, business activities, and correct selection of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 177 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790975</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment requires a proper functional comparability analysis before arm&#039;s length price can be affirmed. The record showed a disputed basic profile of the assessee, with one view treating it as a trader in iron ore and coal and another as engaged in production of ferrous products, while the selected comparables were said to have a manufacturing profile. Because the earlier finding on comparability was cryptic and lacked adequate functional and statistical examination, the matter was set aside for fresh consideration by the Dispute Resolution Panel on the assessee&#039;s product profile, business activities, and correct selection of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>