<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 190 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790988</link>
    <description>Deduction under Section 80-IB had to be given effect before recomputing deduction under Section 80-HHC, because Chapter VI-A deductions must follow the governing Supreme Court method. The Court found the existing assessment computation contrary to that approved basis and therefore unsustainable. The income and deductions were directed to be recomputed in accordance with law, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 10:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 190 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790988</link>
      <description>Deduction under Section 80-IB had to be given effect before recomputing deduction under Section 80-HHC, because Chapter VI-A deductions must follow the governing Supreme Court method. The Court found the existing assessment computation contrary to that approved basis and therefore unsustainable. The income and deductions were directed to be recomputed in accordance with law, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>