<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 147 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790945</link>
    <description>Where an adjudication order is appealable under the Finance Act, 1994, writ jurisdiction need not be invoked and the party should ordinarily be relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. The Court treated the availability of an effective appeal as sufficient reason not to entertain the writ petition. The grievance of delayed adjudication was left open to be urged before the Appellate Authority along with other permissible grounds. The petitioner was allowed to pursue the appeal subject to compliance with statutory requirements, and the appellate forum was directed to decide the matter on merits without insisting on limitation if the appeal was filed within the stated period after bona fide pursuit before the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 147 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790945</link>
      <description>Where an adjudication order is appealable under the Finance Act, 1994, writ jurisdiction need not be invoked and the party should ordinarily be relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. The Court treated the availability of an effective appeal as sufficient reason not to entertain the writ petition. The grievance of delayed adjudication was left open to be urged before the Appellate Authority along with other permissible grounds. The petitioner was allowed to pursue the appeal subject to compliance with statutory requirements, and the appellate forum was directed to decide the matter on merits without insisting on limitation if the appeal was filed within the stated period after bona fide pursuit before the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>