https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790950 Writ intervention against GST registration cancellation was declined because an efficacious statutory remedy for revocation was available under the CGST framework, and the cancellation was based on alleged non-compliance with input tax credit conditions. Interference with the blocking of input tax credit was also refused because it was linked to allegations of fraudulent availment and an ongoing investigation. The Court indicated that the petitioner should pursue the remedy available before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, and no relief was granted in writ jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790950 Writ intervention against GST registration cancellation was declined because an efficacious statutory remedy for revocation was available under the CGST framework, and the cancellation was based on alleged non-compliance with input tax credit conditions. Interference with the blocking of input tax credit was also refused because it was linked to allegations of fraudulent availment and an ongoing investigation. The Court indicated that the petitioner should pursue the remedy available before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, and no relief was granted in writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws GST Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790950