<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 162 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790960</link>
    <description>GST proceedings cannot be maintained against an amalgamating company after it has ceased to exist pursuant to a sanctioned merger, because action against a non-existent entity is void ab initio and participation in the proceedings does not cure the jurisdictional defect. Section 87 of the CGST Act was treated as limited to liability arising in the intervening period between the effective date of the merger and the date of the order, and not as authority to issue notice or adjudicate against a dissolved entity after amalgamation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 162 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790960</link>
      <description>GST proceedings cannot be maintained against an amalgamating company after it has ceased to exist pursuant to a sanctioned merger, because action against a non-existent entity is void ab initio and participation in the proceedings does not cure the jurisdictional defect. Section 87 of the CGST Act was treated as limited to liability arising in the intervening period between the effective date of the merger and the date of the order, and not as authority to issue notice or adjudicate against a dissolved entity after amalgamation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>