<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Joint venture obligations are not taxable service when co-venturers perform mutual duties for a common commercial objective.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99422</link>
    <description>Performance of reciprocal obligations under a project development agreement in a common commercial joint venture was not a taxable service, because each co-venturer was discharging its own duties to achieve the venture&#039;s object rather than rendering an activity to another for consideration. The Tribunal held that the arrangement for revival of a sick sugar unit, including installation and operation of the power generation facility and supply of inputs for sugar operations, constituted mutual performance by co-venturers and not renting of immovable property or any other service. The service tax demands and penalty were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Joint venture obligations are not taxable service when co-venturers perform mutual duties for a common commercial objective.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99422</link>
      <description>Performance of reciprocal obligations under a project development agreement in a common commercial joint venture was not a taxable service, because each co-venturer was discharging its own duties to achieve the venture&#039;s object rather than rendering an activity to another for consideration. The Tribunal held that the arrangement for revival of a sick sugar unit, including installation and operation of the power generation facility and supply of inputs for sugar operations, constituted mutual performance by co-venturers and not renting of immovable property or any other service. The service tax demands and penalty were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:56:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>