https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51488 Condonation of an 861-day delay in filing Revenue appeals was refused because the Commissioner (Appeals) had already examined the facts and law, accepted the order-in-appeal, and decided not to challenge it, bringing finality to the matter on merits. A later administrative direction from the Chief Commissioner to file appeals was not treated as sufficient cause for the delay. The cited Supreme Court decision in State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani was found inapplicable on its facts. The condonation petitions were rejected and the connected appeals were dismissed. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:34:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51488 Condonation of an 861-day delay in filing Revenue appeals was refused because the Commissioner (Appeals) had already examined the facts and law, accepted the order-in-appeal, and decided not to challenge it, bringing finality to the matter on merits. A later administrative direction from the Chief Commissioner to file appeals was not treated as sufficient cause for the delay. The cited Supreme Court decision in State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani was found inapplicable on its facts. The condonation petitions were rejected and the connected appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51488