https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468379 A Section 34 challenge under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was held time-barred because it was filed long after receipt of the award and beyond the statutory outer limit of three months plus thirty days. The Supreme Court's pandemic-related extension could operate only within the period it allowed and could not be deferred for later use after expiry. The CIRP moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code excluded time only for the period it actually ran, but it could not revive a limitation period already exhausted by the pandemic relaxation. The challenge was therefore barred by limitation and dismissal as time-barred was justified. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2026 19:50:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468379 A Section 34 challenge under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was held time-barred because it was filed long after receipt of the award and beyond the statutory outer limit of three months plus thirty days. The Supreme Court's pandemic-related extension could operate only within the period it allowed and could not be deferred for later use after expiry. The CIRP moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code excluded time only for the period it actually ran, but it could not revive a limitation period already exhausted by the pandemic relaxation. The challenge was therefore barred by limitation and dismissal as time-barred was justified. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468379