https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790868 Rule 11 inherent powers under the NCLT Rules cannot be used to review or reopen a merits-based order rejecting a Section 9 application on the basis of documents later claimed to have been discovered. The proper scope of recall is confined to exceptional defects such as fraud, collusion, inherent lack of jurisdiction, or mistake of the court; it does not extend to supplying evidence omitted from the original proceeding. Where the principal order has already been affirmed in appeal, reopening it by recall is further impermissible. On these principles, the recall application was not maintainable. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2026 07:40:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790868 Rule 11 inherent powers under the NCLT Rules cannot be used to review or reopen a merits-based order rejecting a Section 9 application on the basis of documents later claimed to have been discovered. The proper scope of recall is confined to exceptional defects such as fraud, collusion, inherent lack of jurisdiction, or mistake of the court; it does not extend to supplying evidence omitted from the original proceeding. Where the principal order has already been affirmed in appeal, reopening it by recall is further impermissible. On these principles, the recall application was not maintainable. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790868