<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 85 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790883</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IC was not denied merely because Form 10CCB was uploaded after the due date, where the audit report had been obtained in time and was on record before processing under section 143(1). The requirement to file the report along with the return was treated as directory, so delayed electronic filing did not defeat the substantive claim. On that basis, rejection of rectification was unsustainable and the deduction remained allowable despite the belated upload.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 85 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790883</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IC was not denied merely because Form 10CCB was uploaded after the due date, where the audit report had been obtained in time and was on record before processing under section 143(1). The requirement to file the report along with the return was treated as directory, so delayed electronic filing did not defeat the substantive claim. On that basis, rejection of rectification was unsustainable and the deduction remained allowable despite the belated upload.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>