<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 158 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51478</link>
    <description>Where the appellate authority admitted and relied on evidence not examined by the adjudicating authority, the proper course was remand so that the material could be tested and the issue reconsidered afresh with opportunity to support the claim. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, and the substantive question on inclusion of the value of patterns in assessable value was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 158 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51478</link>
      <description>Where the appellate authority admitted and relied on evidence not examined by the adjudicating authority, the proper course was remand so that the material could be tested and the issue reconsidered afresh with opportunity to support the claim. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo consideration, and the substantive question on inclusion of the value of patterns in assessable value was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>