<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 236 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51476</link>
    <description>Ready Mix Concrete is characterised by the manufacturing process, not merely by the plant&#039;s location at the construction site, so a site-based plant may still produce dutiable RMC under tariff heading 3824.20. The exemption for concrete mix made and used at site applies only to concrete actually mixed and consumed at the site, and not to RMC prepared through batching, transit mixing and controlled placement before setting. For the post-1-3-1997 period, the extended limitation approach is linked to the absence of clarification sought and the inapplicability of the site-mix exemption to RMC; the earlier period remained outside duty. Valuation and penalty were left for fresh determination on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 236 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51476</link>
      <description>Ready Mix Concrete is characterised by the manufacturing process, not merely by the plant&#039;s location at the construction site, so a site-based plant may still produce dutiable RMC under tariff heading 3824.20. The exemption for concrete mix made and used at site applies only to concrete actually mixed and consumed at the site, and not to RMC prepared through batching, transit mixing and controlled placement before setting. For the post-1-3-1997 period, the extended limitation approach is linked to the absence of clarification sought and the inapplicability of the site-mix exemption to RMC; the earlier period remained outside duty. Valuation and penalty were left for fresh determination on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>