<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Consolidated GST show cause notices upheld, while limitation must still be tested separately for each period covered.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99418</link>
    <description>Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act do not bar a common or consolidated show cause notice for more than one tax period or financial year. The Court held that the references to &quot;any period&quot; and the limitation provisions do not confine notice issuance to a single financial year, while each component of a consolidated notice must still independently satisfy the applicable limitation test. It also rejected the objection based on pecuniary jurisdiction of the proper officer. Where Orders-in-Original were challenged, the Court restored the statutory position and granted time to file appeals, with limitation objections not to be raised if appeals were filed within the period allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:40:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Consolidated GST show cause notices upheld, while limitation must still be tested separately for each period covered.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99418</link>
      <description>Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act do not bar a common or consolidated show cause notice for more than one tax period or financial year. The Court held that the references to &quot;any period&quot; and the limitation provisions do not confine notice issuance to a single financial year, while each component of a consolidated notice must still independently satisfy the applicable limitation test. It also rejected the objection based on pecuniary jurisdiction of the proper officer. Where Orders-in-Original were challenged, the Court restored the statutory position and granted time to file appeals, with limitation objections not to be raised if appeals were filed within the period allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:40:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>