https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468368 Writ relief under Article 226 is discretionary, and inordinate delay and laches remain material grounds for declining that relief. A petition filed after nearly six years was held not to merit intervention because the explanation did not cover the full period of inaction. The Court also rejected reliance on alleged counsel negligence, noting that a litigant must show continuous diligence and a credible account for the entire delay. The writ petition was dismissed for unexplained delay and laches. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2026 22:16:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468368 Writ relief under Article 226 is discretionary, and inordinate delay and laches remain material grounds for declining that relief. A petition filed after nearly six years was held not to merit intervention because the explanation did not cover the full period of inaction. The Court also rejected reliance on alleged counsel negligence, noting that a litigant must show continuous diligence and a credible account for the entire delay. The writ petition was dismissed for unexplained delay and laches. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468368