<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1559 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468365</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A, including one computed under Rule 8D, is discussed as being confined to expenditure relatable to exempt income and not capable of exceeding the exempt dividend earned during the year. Where the assessee has made a suo motu disallowance supported by the record, a larger enhancement on the facts is not warranted. The note records that the Tribunal upheld deletion of the further disallowance and left the appellate relief undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1559 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468365</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A, including one computed under Rule 8D, is discussed as being confined to expenditure relatable to exempt income and not capable of exceeding the exempt dividend earned during the year. Where the assessee has made a suo motu disallowance supported by the record, a larger enhancement on the facts is not warranted. The note records that the Tribunal upheld deletion of the further disallowance and left the appellate relief undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>