<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 130 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the assessable value of the car, setting aside the enhancement. However, the violation of the Exim Policy resulted in the confiscation of the car, with a reduced redemption fine and penalty imposed. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalties in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 130 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the assessable value of the car, setting aside the enhancement. However, the violation of the Exim Policy resulted in the confiscation of the car, with a reduced redemption fine and penalty imposed. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalties in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>