<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 15 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</link>
    <description>Provisional and confirmed attachment of a school building and underlying land was sustained because the property was traced to funds substantially derived from donations by an unlawful organisation and linked to scheduled money-laundering activity. The Tribunal found that donated funds received by the associated trust had been diverted into construction on land leased from the appellant, and relied on the lease timing, transaction structure, and evidence showing the appellant was not a bona fide stranger to the chain of dealings. The absence of a direct charge against the appellant or the trust, and the later termination of the lease, were insufficient to remove the taint attached to the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 15 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</link>
      <description>Provisional and confirmed attachment of a school building and underlying land was sustained because the property was traced to funds substantially derived from donations by an unlawful organisation and linked to scheduled money-laundering activity. The Tribunal found that donated funds received by the associated trust had been diverted into construction on land leased from the appellant, and relied on the lease timing, transaction structure, and evidence showing the appellant was not a bona fide stranger to the chain of dealings. The absence of a direct charge against the appellant or the trust, and the later termination of the lease, were insufficient to remove the taint attached to the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>