<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 15 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</link>
    <description>Funds traced to donations received by trusts linked to an unlawful organisation, and used substantially to construct a school building on leased land, were treated as proceeds of crime under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The lease termination did not break the nexus between the building and the tainted funds, because the construction was financed from money connected with scheduled offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the record supported the inference that the property was derived from criminal activity. The attachment of the school building was upheld, and the appellant&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 15 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</link>
      <description>Funds traced to donations received by trusts linked to an unlawful organisation, and used substantially to construct a school building on leased land, were treated as proceeds of crime under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The lease termination did not break the nexus between the building and the tainted funds, because the construction was financed from money connected with scheduled offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the record supported the inference that the property was derived from criminal activity. The attachment of the school building was upheld, and the appellant&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>