<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 29 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790827</link>
    <description>Imported ammonium nitrate was accepted as originating from Uzbekistan because the country-of-origin certificate and supporting purchase, invoice, transport and certificate records consistently supported that origin, and the Revenue did not verify or rebut the primary documentary evidence. A customs demand based only on statements and electronic communications could not stand where those materials were not independently corroborated, statutory requirements for electronic records were not shown to be satisfied, and cross-examination was not effectively provided. On that basis, the anti-dumping duty exemption was upheld and the demand, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 29 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790827</link>
      <description>Imported ammonium nitrate was accepted as originating from Uzbekistan because the country-of-origin certificate and supporting purchase, invoice, transport and certificate records consistently supported that origin, and the Revenue did not verify or rebut the primary documentary evidence. A customs demand based only on statements and electronic communications could not stand where those materials were not independently corroborated, statutory requirements for electronic records were not shown to be satisfied, and cross-examination was not effectively provided. On that basis, the anti-dumping duty exemption was upheld and the demand, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>