<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790845</link>
    <description>Contractual interest payable under a capital bond arrangement was held to be deductible as business expenditure where the agreement expressly required the assessee to pay interest to the counterparty on funds placed in the capital bond account. The liability was treated as enforceable under the contract and coextensive with the interest income earned from those deposits, which was taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands. On a fresh reading of clause 5, the earlier view that no obligation existed was not accepted, and the corresponding interest expenditure was allowed as a deduction. The disallowance was deleted and the deduction claim succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 47 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790845</link>
      <description>Contractual interest payable under a capital bond arrangement was held to be deductible as business expenditure where the agreement expressly required the assessee to pay interest to the counterparty on funds placed in the capital bond account. The liability was treated as enforceable under the contract and coextensive with the interest income earned from those deposits, which was taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands. On a fresh reading of clause 5, the earlier view that no obligation existed was not accepted, and the corresponding interest expenditure was allowed as a deduction. The disallowance was deleted and the deduction claim succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>