<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 169 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51455</link>
    <description>DEPB classification of exported piston rings turned on whether they fell within the generic entry for &quot;Pig Iron Products.&quot; General Instruction No. 3 of Appendix 28A excluded use of a generic description only where a specific rate was prescribed for the particular goods. As piston rings were not specifically listed and were manufactured from pig iron through casting, the generic entry applied. The description was not restricted to primary pig iron products and did not exclude automotive parts. Consequently, exported piston rings qualified for DEPB benefit under the generic entry, and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:21:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 169 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51455</link>
      <description>DEPB classification of exported piston rings turned on whether they fell within the generic entry for &quot;Pig Iron Products.&quot; General Instruction No. 3 of Appendix 28A excluded use of a generic description only where a specific rate was prescribed for the particular goods. As piston rings were not specifically listed and were manufactured from pig iron through casting, the generic entry applied. The description was not restricted to primary pig iron products and did not exclude automotive parts. Consequently, exported piston rings qualified for DEPB benefit under the generic entry, and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>