<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund claims for tax paid under mistake of law remain subject to limitation and unjust enrichment requirements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99342</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid under a claimed mistake of law remained subject to the statutory refund mechanism under section 11B, including the prescribed limitation period and unjust enrichment test. Relying on Mafatlal Industries and Southern Surface Finishers, the CESTAT held that later realisation that tax was not payable did not displace statutory limits, and the assessee failed to prove that the tax burden had not been passed on to customers. The refund rejection on both limitation and unjust enrichment was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund claims for tax paid under mistake of law remain subject to limitation and unjust enrichment requirements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99342</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid under a claimed mistake of law remained subject to the statutory refund mechanism under section 11B, including the prescribed limitation period and unjust enrichment test. Relying on Mafatlal Industries and Southern Surface Finishers, the CESTAT held that later realisation that tax was not payable did not displace statutory limits, and the assessee failed to prove that the tax burden had not been passed on to customers. The refund rejection on both limitation and unjust enrichment was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:14:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>