<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1817 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790748</link>
    <description>A recusal request was tested against the fair-minded and informed observer standard, rather than the litigants&#039; subjective unease. Prima facie observations in an interim order, advance service on defence counsel, and interim protection against remarks and departmental action were held insufficient, by themselves, to show pre-judgment or bias. Earlier rulings in connected PMLA matters were confined to the issues then decided and did not create a disqualifying predisposition. Allegations based on political association, public statements, or relatives&#039; professional links were found too remote and speculative to establish a real conflict of interest. Expeditious listing and prior adverse rulings, without more, were also held inadequate for recusal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1817 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790748</link>
      <description>A recusal request was tested against the fair-minded and informed observer standard, rather than the litigants&#039; subjective unease. Prima facie observations in an interim order, advance service on defence counsel, and interim protection against remarks and departmental action were held insufficient, by themselves, to show pre-judgment or bias. Earlier rulings in connected PMLA matters were confined to the issues then decided and did not create a disqualifying predisposition. Allegations based on political association, public statements, or relatives&#039; professional links were found too remote and speculative to establish a real conflict of interest. Expeditious listing and prior adverse rulings, without more, were also held inadequate for recusal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>