<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1823 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790754</link>
    <description>Waste mud or spent earth arising involuntarily during bleaching of crude palm oil is not treated as excisable goods under the amended Central Excise framework. The Tribunal noted that the earlier departmental circular treating such waste as dutiable had been withdrawn, and that later circulars and supporting decisions favoured exclusion of waste or by-products emerging without conscious effort in manufacture from central excise duty. It also relied on the exemption covering waste, parings and scrap arising in the course of manufacture. Accordingly, the demand was not sustainable because marketability or clearance for consideration alone did not make the waste dutiable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1823 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790754</link>
      <description>Waste mud or spent earth arising involuntarily during bleaching of crude palm oil is not treated as excisable goods under the amended Central Excise framework. The Tribunal noted that the earlier departmental circular treating such waste as dutiable had been withdrawn, and that later circulars and supporting decisions favoured exclusion of waste or by-products emerging without conscious effort in manufacture from central excise duty. It also relied on the exemption covering waste, parings and scrap arising in the course of manufacture. Accordingly, the demand was not sustainable because marketability or clearance for consideration alone did not make the waste dutiable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>