<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790763</link>
    <description>Reimbursed expenses collected in the course of Custom House Agent services were held outside taxable value for the pre-14 May 2015 period because subordinate valuation rules could not expand Section 67 retrospectively. Commission or incentive from booking and sale of cargo space was treated as trading surplus on a principal-to-principal basis, not consideration for Business Auxiliary Service, so the levy failed. The extended limitation period was also found unsustainable because prior departmental inquiry and notice did not establish suppression, wilful misstatement, or intent to evade tax. The demand, penalty, and appellate confirmation were set aside in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790763</link>
      <description>Reimbursed expenses collected in the course of Custom House Agent services were held outside taxable value for the pre-14 May 2015 period because subordinate valuation rules could not expand Section 67 retrospectively. Commission or incentive from booking and sale of cargo space was treated as trading surplus on a principal-to-principal basis, not consideration for Business Auxiliary Service, so the levy failed. The extended limitation period was also found unsustainable because prior departmental inquiry and notice did not establish suppression, wilful misstatement, or intent to evade tax. The demand, penalty, and appellate confirmation were set aside in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>