<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1843 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790774</link>
    <description>Reusable returnable metal containers used only as packing material for imported synthetic rubber were not liable to customs duty because they did not form part of the imported goods for customs purposes. The value of such containers also could not be separately added to the assessable value where the packing or rental cost was already included in the CIF value. On that basis, the customs duty demand, reassessment, interest, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1843 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790774</link>
      <description>Reusable returnable metal containers used only as packing material for imported synthetic rubber were not liable to customs duty because they did not form part of the imported goods for customs purposes. The value of such containers also could not be separately added to the assessable value where the packing or rental cost was already included in the CIF value. On that basis, the customs duty demand, reassessment, interest, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>