<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1854 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined interference under Article 136 and dismissed the petition. The dispute concerned classification of movement of goods from the appellant&#039;s factory in Maharashtra to Haridwar in Uttarakhand to meet purchase orders of Patanjali, but no further interference with the impugned order was found warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1854 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined interference under Article 136 and dismissed the petition. The dispute concerned classification of movement of goods from the appellant&#039;s factory in Maharashtra to Haridwar in Uttarakhand to meet purchase orders of Patanjali, but no further interference with the impugned order was found warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>