https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785 Movement of goods from the appellant's factory at Indapur, Pune to Haridwar was described as being made to fulfil Patanjali's purchase orders, raising the issue of classification of the transfer of goods. The record states that delay was condoned and the special leave petition was dismissed because no case for interference with the impugned order was made out under Article 136 of the Constitution. The text therefore reflects a transfer-of-goods classification dispute and the Supreme Court's refusal to interfere at the special leave stage. en-us Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785 Movement of goods from the appellant's factory at Indapur, Pune to Haridwar was described as being made to fulfil Patanjali's purchase orders, raising the issue of classification of the transfer of goods. The record states that delay was condoned and the special leave petition was dismissed because no case for interference with the impugned order was made out under Article 136 of the Constitution. The text therefore reflects a transfer-of-goods classification dispute and the Supreme Court's refusal to interfere at the special leave stage. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790785