https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790792 The Court did not decide the merits of the interest demand and instead directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's pending representations on merits. That consideration was to be informed by the decisions referred to in the record and had to be completed after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was thus disposed of with a direction to pass a reasoned order on the representations, leaving the substantive interest issue open. en-us Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790792 The Court did not decide the merits of the interest demand and instead directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's pending representations on merits. That consideration was to be informed by the decisions referred to in the record and had to be completed after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was thus disposed of with a direction to pass a reasoned order on the representations, leaving the substantive interest issue open. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790792