<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liberal condonation of delay applied where death of the tax representative created a communication vacuum; jurisdictional objection remanded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99331</link>
    <description>A liberal approach governs condonation where refusal would defeat substantial justice, and the death of the authorised representative handling the assessee&#039;s tax matters in the faceless regime constituted sufficient cause for the 430-day delay. The Court also held that a jurisdictional objection that reassessment may be void for want of approval under law cannot be excluded by a rigid or hyper-technical limitation analysis. By refusing condonation solely for lack of documentary support and not addressing the pleaded defect, the Tribunal misdirected itself. The delay was condoned, the limitation dismissal was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for fresh adjudication, with the Section 151 validity issue to be decided as a preliminary issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liberal condonation of delay applied where death of the tax representative created a communication vacuum; jurisdictional objection remanded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99331</link>
      <description>A liberal approach governs condonation where refusal would defeat substantial justice, and the death of the authorised representative handling the assessee&#039;s tax matters in the faceless regime constituted sufficient cause for the 430-day delay. The Court also held that a jurisdictional objection that reassessment may be void for want of approval under law cannot be excluded by a rigid or hyper-technical limitation analysis. By refusing condonation solely for lack of documentary support and not addressing the pleaded defect, the Tribunal misdirected itself. The delay was condoned, the limitation dismissal was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for fresh adjudication, with the Section 151 validity issue to be decided as a preliminary issue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>