<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2118 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468344</link>
    <description>An addition based solely on an uncorroborated WhatsApp chat or loose digital note cannot be sustained where the figure relied on is arbitrarily inflated without independent evidence. The Tribunal treated the third-party digital material as a dumb document because it was not seized from the assessee and was unsupported by bank records, ledgers, statements, or proof of actual fund movement. It also noted that the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C do not apply where the material is not found in the assessee&#039;s possession and remains unverified. For a non-resident assessee, an unproved digital entry could not establish unexplained investment or taxable income in India, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2118 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468344</link>
      <description>An addition based solely on an uncorroborated WhatsApp chat or loose digital note cannot be sustained where the figure relied on is arbitrarily inflated without independent evidence. The Tribunal treated the third-party digital material as a dumb document because it was not seized from the assessee and was unsupported by bank records, ledgers, statements, or proof of actual fund movement. It also noted that the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C do not apply where the material is not found in the assessee&#039;s possession and remains unverified. For a non-resident assessee, an unproved digital entry could not establish unexplained investment or taxable income in India, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>