<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1707 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468337</link>
    <description>Classification of a composite digital camera under Chapter 85 turns on its principal function under the tariff scheme and the General Rules for Interpretation. A Canon camera whose primary character was still image capture, despite advanced video capability, was treated as classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8525 89 00; standard accessories compulsorily supplied with the camera and not separately charged followed the camera&#039;s classification, while separately supplied optional accessories would be classified on their own terms. The same principal-function analysis applied to exemption under Sl. No. 502 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus: a digital still image video camera remained eligible even if it could also record moving images, and the absence of a video-duration limit did not exclude it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1707 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468337</link>
      <description>Classification of a composite digital camera under Chapter 85 turns on its principal function under the tariff scheme and the General Rules for Interpretation. A Canon camera whose primary character was still image capture, despite advanced video capability, was treated as classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8525 89 00; standard accessories compulsorily supplied with the camera and not separately charged followed the camera&#039;s classification, while separately supplied optional accessories would be classified on their own terms. The same principal-function analysis applied to exemption under Sl. No. 502 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus: a digital still image video camera remained eligible even if it could also record moving images, and the absence of a video-duration limit did not exclude it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>