<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51430</link>
    <description>Input credit reversed at the time of job-work clearance was not subject to any further demand under Rule 57CC, because the reversal had already been made and accepted by the department. Freight and insurance shown separately in invoices were also excluded from assessable value where the sale price was ex-factory and the sale was complete at the factory gate, making the buyer&#039;s premises not the place of removal. The commentary notes that both the credit-reversal and valuation issues were resolved in favour of the assessee on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51430</link>
      <description>Input credit reversed at the time of job-work clearance was not subject to any further demand under Rule 57CC, because the reversal had already been made and accepted by the department. Freight and insurance shown separately in invoices were also excluded from assessable value where the sale price was ex-factory and the sale was complete at the factory gate, making the buyer&#039;s premises not the place of removal. The commentary notes that both the credit-reversal and valuation issues were resolved in favour of the assessee on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>