<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1545 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468336</link>
    <description>The petition concerned whether dividend distribution tax paid on dividends remitted to a Japanese resident should be limited to the treaty rate under Article 10 of the India-Japan DTAA, and whether excess tax refund with statutory interest was due. The challenge was to the rejection of the request for treaty-rate application and refund. The revenue&#039;s position was that dividend distribution tax under Section 115-O was payable by the distributing company, while the dividend was exempt in the shareholder&#039;s hands under Section 10, so the statutory rate under the Act governed the levy. Notice was issued and a counter affidavit directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1545 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468336</link>
      <description>The petition concerned whether dividend distribution tax paid on dividends remitted to a Japanese resident should be limited to the treaty rate under Article 10 of the India-Japan DTAA, and whether excess tax refund with statutory interest was due. The challenge was to the rejection of the request for treaty-rate application and refund. The revenue&#039;s position was that dividend distribution tax under Section 115-O was payable by the distributing company, while the dividend was exempt in the shareholder&#039;s hands under Section 10, so the statutory rate under the Act governed the levy. Notice was issued and a counter affidavit directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>