<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51428</link>
    <description>Control samples of manufactured medicines retained inside the factory under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act were treated as liable to central excise duty because the excise rules deemed in-factory consumption or utilisation to be removal from the place of manufacture, and their retention for quality control did not exclude them from the charging provisions. The plea that the samples were taken before the goods became excisable was rejected, and the duty demand was sustained. Although liability was upheld, the penalty was found excessive on proportionality grounds and was reduced to a nominal amount, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:11:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51428</link>
      <description>Control samples of manufactured medicines retained inside the factory under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act were treated as liable to central excise duty because the excise rules deemed in-factory consumption or utilisation to be removal from the place of manufacture, and their retention for quality control did not exclude them from the charging provisions. The plea that the samples were taken before the goods became excisable was rejected, and the duty demand was sustained. Although liability was upheld, the penalty was found excessive on proportionality grounds and was reduced to a nominal amount, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>