https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790732 A SARFAESI challenge succeeded where the borrower questioned the demand notice, possession notice and the Section 14 order, and the Tribunal found no material showing any borrower objection under Section 13(3A) but also no rebuttal from the secured creditor on alleged defects in service, affixture and publication of the possession notice or on compliance verification before invoking Section 14. The possession notice and the magistrate's order were set aside for non-compliance with mandatory procedure. A separate contempt complaint based on breach of the stay order was not entertained because the Tribunal noted it had no contempt jurisdiction, and the complaint was closed. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790732 A SARFAESI challenge succeeded where the borrower questioned the demand notice, possession notice and the Section 14 order, and the Tribunal found no material showing any borrower objection under Section 13(3A) but also no rebuttal from the secured creditor on alleged defects in service, affixture and publication of the possession notice or on compliance verification before invoking Section 14. The possession notice and the magistrate's order were set aside for non-compliance with mandatory procedure. A separate contempt complaint based on breach of the stay order was not entertained because the Tribunal noted it had no contempt jurisdiction, and the complaint was closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790732