https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790738 A writ challenge to a detention notice and recovery steps was not entertained where the underlying order-in-original, which had reclassified the goods, confirmed differential duty with interest, ordered confiscation, and imposed penalty and redemption fine, had not been appealed. The Court treated the detention dispute as dependent on compliance with that prior adjudication and noted the reported payment of differential duty and withdrawal of the detention notice. It left the customs authority to assess the petitioner's compliance and any further action on the detention issue, and dismissed the petition. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790738 A writ challenge to a detention notice and recovery steps was not entertained where the underlying order-in-original, which had reclassified the goods, confirmed differential duty with interest, ordered confiscation, and imposed penalty and redemption fine, had not been appealed. The Court treated the detention dispute as dependent on compliance with that prior adjudication and noted the reported payment of differential duty and withdrawal of the detention notice. It left the customs authority to assess the petitioner's compliance and any further action on the detention issue, and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790738